Mr. Tennyson, wrote on my blog (www.andyhaydon.com) and he identified the problem of surface transportation. This is why a tunnel is proposed and supported by most taxpayers.
He took selective data from various specific transit systems to make his argument. This skews the facts.
According to the United States General Accounting Office, the United States Dept. of Transportation, The U.S. Transportation Research Board, The U.S. National Transit Database, The Canadian Fact Book, McCormick Rankin, and Toronto Transit System,
By the way BRT is faster.
The real LRT story:
Welcome to LRT and Poverty
Andy
I would like to see what the modal share would be once a ring road is built, bus lanes are turned into HOV-2 lanes, and a better supply of parking is made downtown. We currently have good ridership only because of so many restriction on motorists. We've made a poor transit service look good only by these motorist restrictions. Quite pathetic in my mind.
ReplyDeleteRE: Anonymous said...
ReplyDeleteI would like to see what the modal share would be once a ring road is built, bus lanes are turned into HOV-2 lanes, and a better supply of parking is made..................
This statement is totally irrelevant and is just another smear tactic to make our current transit system look bad. The purpose of mass transit is to make it easier for people to leave their cars at home and NOT take them down town.
GRP